RT’s Three Key Takeaways:
- The case concerned a dairy farm employee in Texas who contracted the extremely pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1), or hen flu, from shut interplay with contaminated cattle on the farm. Signs initially manifested as pinkeye within the employee’s proper eye.
- Medical evaluations of the affected employee revealed a subconjunctival hemorrhage and serous drainage in the suitable eye, however no respiratory signs. Laboratory exams confirmed the presence of the identical pressure of hen flu circulating within the cattle, indicating transmission from cattle to human.
- Regardless of the employee’s an infection, his situation improved with oral oseltamivir remedy (Tamiflu) and residential isolation. Moreover, none of his family members, who acquired antiviral remedy as a precautionary measure, have been contaminated. Viral sequences from each the employee and the contaminated cattle confirmed primarily avian genetic traits, with no mutations growing human transmission threat, though a mutation related to viral adaptation to mammalian hosts was recognized.
A case report revealed within the New England Journal of Drugs supplies new insights into the uncommon transmission of the extremely pathogenic avian influenza, or H5N1, virus from dairy cattle to a human.
The affected person, a dairy farm employee in Texas, skilled preliminary signs of redness and discomfort in his proper eye in late March 2024, in line with the report by Texas well being officers and the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention. The employee had been carefully interacting with each wholesome and in poor health cattle on the farm. The affected cattle displayed signs like decreased urge for food and decreased milk manufacturing, that are per H5N1 infections noticed in different animals. The person had repoted sporting gloves however no eye or respiratory safety.
Medical evaluations revealed a subconjunctival hemorrhage and serous drainage within the employee’s proper eye. Nevertheless, his important indicators remained secure, and he exhibited no respiratory signs. Laboratory exams utilizing real-time reverse-transcription–polymerase-chain-reaction from conjunctival and nasopharyngeal swabs revealed he had the identical pressure of hen flu that was circulating in cattle.
[RELATED: 1 in 5 Grocery Store Milk Samples Test Positive for Bird Flu]
The employee was positioned in residence isolation and handled with oral oseltamivir (Tamiflu). The next day, the employee reported no signs other than discomfort in each eyes; upon reevaluation, it was found that the employee had subconjunctival hemorrhage in each eyes, with no related visible impairment.
His situation improved over the next days with none respiratory signs, and no family members—who have been additionally given an antiviral as a precautionary measure—have been contaminated.
Viral sequences from the Texas dairy employee and cattle retained primarily avian genetic traits, the authors wrote, and confirmed no mutations growing human transmission threat. Nevertheless, the viral sequences had a mutation (PB2 E627K) related to viral adaptation to mammalian hosts, seen in previous human and animal H5N1 infections and different hen flu subtypes.
No genetic traits have been discovered within the virus that would cut back its susceptibility to US Meals and Drug Administration-approved antiviral medication for influenza, the authors said.
Picture 58105004 © David Molina | Dreamstime.com
